Kev says

Take Back Australia … Reject Socialism

What ?

I was going through the enormous number of websites this Government has created to help support their theory on Climate Change, and although I discovered so many made claims that had no basis, this site was a classic


It claims “Australia is a predominantly coastal society. About 85 per cent of the population lives in the coastal region and it is of immense economic, social and environmental importance to the nation.  The Australian coast is a dynamic place and in the last 50,000 years humans have witnessed major changes in sea level, habitats and the shape of the shoreline from great storm events. “

The obvious flaw in this statement is the claim humans have witnessed major changes in sea level in the last 50,000.  This is indicative of all this Department’s evidence of Climate Change, never let the truth get in the way of a good story!!!
And yet it didn’t stop here, below .  Sounds fair enough and if it wasn’t for the fact that settlements were normally created where the supply ships (the only mode of overseas travel at that time)  were able to deliver their wares and passengers.!!!

“Over the last 6000 to 7000 years Australia’s coasts have been relatively stable. Since 1788 settlements have been built along the coast in expectation that sea level would remain broadly unchanged. “

And yet again they start, no data showing when these changes started, no evidence why this started, no evidence sea levels are actually rising, yet they claim Global warming (remember Global warming was mainly disproven, and so they used the term Climate Change, but not this Dept.) will increase risks to settlements?? 
(settlement = a place newly settled; colony ‘…..a collection of dwellings forming a community, esp on a frontier,  or……..a community formed by members of a group, esp of a religious sect)

Maybe it is one of the OLD Climate Change staff that wrote this piece ?

Now I have searched for the evidence we are about to be drowned, but apart from some fanciful writing and some imaginative modelling, their is no empirical evidence of this occurring either ??

“some of Australia’s coasts are now changing. A new climate era driven by global warming will increase risks to settlements, industries, the delivery of services and natural ecosystems within Australia’s coastal zone. It is important that these risks are understood. The risks of sea level rise are not confined to the coast itself. Flooding may impact on areas some distance inland, for example along estuaries, rivers, lakes or lagoons.”

The Climate Commission claims we have warmed .8C degree since 1906, however the chart below shows our temperatures are currently in a decline.


An article in The New Atlantis website
”As both the National Academy of Sciences and the U.N.’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change have stated, the proxy techniques discussed here are sufficient to show with high confidence that there has been warming in the last century that is anomalous relative to what would have been expected based upon the natural variations of the geologically recent past—and human greenhouse-gas emissions are at least partly to blame. That said, the uncertainties of these techniques make them grossly insufficient to provide the basis for some of the more extreme claims that have been made. We have reason to be sceptical of both those who design elaborate hypotheses to explain away global warming and those who would have us panic.”

Prof Bob Carter is a geologist at James Cook University, Queensland, engaged in paleoclimate research, therefore not as qualified of course as the Governments Commissioner on Climate Change, zoologist Tim Flannery, (who has been hiding out since he became an embarrassment to the Government through his ramblings) Prof Carter said

“Consider the simple fact, drawn from the official temperature records of the Climate Research Unit at the University of East Anglia, that for the years 1998-2005 global average temperature did not increase (there was actually a slight decrease, though not at a rate that differs significantly from zero).

Yes, you did read that right. And also, yes, this eight-year period of temperature stasis did coincide with society’s continued power station and SUV-inspired pumping of yet more carbon dioxide into the atmosphere.”

It would seem reading all of this again The Dept. has made a claim that is not just illogical, it appears to be totally incorrect.

It also appears this Government is pushing their CO2 Tax through without a mandate and with clear signs people do not want this to be passed, it shows an arrogance and a total disconnection of this Government with the people of Australia.
They have even the audacity to have prepared teaching packages to sell man made Climate change, where they have NO evidence to support their claims, they just want everyone to believe their vitriol and are going to brainwash the children who are our future.



14/09/2011 - Posted by | Uncategorized


  1. […] […]

    Pingback by | Australian TEA Party | 15/09/2011 | Reply

  2. The IPCC’s evidence doesn’t count because… ?

    Comment by Ryan | 17/09/2011 | Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: